Cyber PM Assessments: What They Actually Test (And How to Ace Them

In partnership with

Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Subscribe to 1440 today.

Why Assessments Have Become Standard

Companies receive hundreds of applications for cyber roles at all levels. Assessments help them identify candidates who can think clearly under pressure and make sound judgments which are essential skills for Cyber PMs.

Whether you are a career changer, recent graduate, or experienced professional pivoting into cyber, these assessment formats are increasingly common across the industry.

The 3 Assessment Types You will Face

1. Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs)

Realistic workplace scenarios where you rank best-to-worst responses. They test stakeholder thinking, ethics, and decision-making as the exact skills Cyber PMs need.

What they're really testing: Whether you think like a trusted professional who can escalate risks, clarify ambiguity, and prioritise effectively under pressure.

2. Cognitive Ability Tests

Numerical, verbal, and logical reasoning under time pressure. Expect charts, passages, and patterns. Companies want to know you can process information fast and act under stress.

What they're really testing: Your ability to analyse complex data quickly and accurately is crucial when managing cyber incidents or risk assessments.

3. Workstyle & Gamified Assessments

Assess your natural traits, decision style, and problem-solving approach through interactive games or personality questionnaires. Answer authentically but professionally as inconsistent responses get flagged by the system.

What they're really testing: Whether your working style aligns with collaborative, reliable, and risk-aware behaviour expected from PM leaders.

The Critical Mistakes That Kill Applications

1. Treating SJTs like school exams
   Many candidates think there is one “correct” answer, like in math. But SJTs measure judgment, not textbook knowledge.
   Best moves: Show how a trusted PM would act i.e. raise concerns, ask questions if something is unclear, and focus on the most urgent task.
   Example: A teammate ignores a task deadline. Don't fix it silently, instead escalate to your manager because it's a business risk

2. Overcomplicating reasoning tests
   Some candidates overthink every detail and waste time. These are speed-and-accuracy tests, not puzzles to solve perfectly.
   Better approach: Rule out wrong options quickly and pick the most reasonable answer.
   Example: If two numbers obviously don’t fit the pattern, eliminate them fast instead of rechecking all 5 choices three times.

3. Giving mixed signals in personality tests
   Trying to “game the system” backfires. Inconsistencies are flagged by the system.
   Best practice: Answer consistently, like someone who collaborates, delivers on time, and manages risk.
   Example: If you say “I love detailed planning” in one section but later choose “I prefer last-minute decisions,” the system marks you unreliable. Stick with answers that show steady, PM-like behaviour.

Practice Resources (Curated & Ready to Use)

Here are the tools that map directly to the assessments you will face:

• Situational Judgement Tests (SJT):
  SHL · Sova Assessment · Hub Preparation Plus

• Cognitive Ability Tests (Numerical/Verbal/Logical):
  SHL · Talent Q

• Workstyle / Gamified Assessments:
  Arctic Shores

• E-tray / Inbox Simulations:
  Assessment Day

👉 Bookmark these now. Even 20 minutes of daily practice will transform how you perform under timed conditions.