- BeeBuzz Projects
- Posts
- The Hidden Cyber Gaps in Your Project Plan
The Hidden Cyber Gaps in Your Project Plan
Why Your Project Plan Isn’t Complete Without Cybersecurity in Mind
Hello Fellow,
You have nailed scope, time, cost. The dashboard is green.
But something’s missing, and it’s not in the project plan.
It’s the assumptions no one challenged, the handoffs no one validated, the cyber risk no one owned.
In cybersecurity, it’s not the unknown unknowns that get you.
It’s the known unknowns that nobody wants to touch.
In today’s issue, We uncover:
Where most project plans leave gaps in security
What sharp PMs question even without deep security expertise
How to raise hidden risks without raising alarms

Why Cyber Gaps Still Exist, Even in “Well-Run” Projects
Despite agile boards and RACI charts, these gaps keep appearing:
Security is scoped out late or handed off to another team
Project milestones don’t account for security reviews, just delivery
PMs feel unqualified to ask technical security questions
Business pressure pushes go-live, even when red flags are unresolved
And so the gaps stay buried until a breach, audit failure, or customer complaint brings them to light.
This is what I have witnessed time and time again:
“The risk wasn’t that we didn’t plan. The risk was what we assumed was already covered.”
What Smart Cyber PMs Do Differently
You don’t need to be a security expert.
But you do need to think like one.
Here’s what sharp cyber PMs build into their practice:
1. Embed Security Into Conversations, Not Just Documents
Instead of asking abstract questions, try these light but pointed nudges:
“Just curious who’s giving this a security review?”
“Do we know who picks this up if something breaks later?”
“Do we have any approvals or dependencies that might need extra scrutiny?”
These questions lower the barrier to talk about security without making it feel like an audit.
2. Trace the Ownership Gaps, That’s Where Risk Hides
Most breaches happen in the grey zones:
Between vendors
Between BAU and project delivery
Between dev and ops
Draw the boundaries. Name the owners. Revisit them weekly.
3. Use "Assumption Checks" at Every Stage
Add this to your weekly agenda:
“What assumption could get us in trouble later?”
You’ll be surprised what comes up such as access, logging, data location, all missed in the Gantt chart.
4. Create a Culture of Speaking Up
Security blind spots often live in silence:
Junior engineers aren’t sure it’s their job
Senior stakeholders don’t want “negative” updates
Make it safe to say:
“Can we take a second look, just to be safe?”
That’s leadership, not paranoia.
Here’s what often gets missed (until it’s too late):
Unlogged access to sensitive data
Legacy systems bypassed during upgrades
Vendors without proper security SLAs
No plan for handling incidents post-handover
Default admin credentials left untouched
Shadow IT used by delivery teams
Risks marked “accepted” without business owner sign-off
Use this list to pressure test your next delivery review.
Weekly Action
Choose one meeting this week i.e. planning, stand-ups, or check-in.
Ask this one question:
“What’s the one cyber risk we’re not talking about enough?”
You don’t need the answer.
You just need to start the conversation.

My Favourite Links on This Topic
1. NCSC: Secure Development Principles
UK guidance on integrating cyber into digital delivery
🔗 https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/developers-collection
2. IBM: The Cost of a Data Breach Report
2024 edition with root cause analysis of breaches
🔗 https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach
3. OWASP SAMM
Maturity model to assess and improve your secure software practices
🔗 https://owaspsamm.org/
Final Thought
“You don’t prevent cyber failures with tech alone.
You prevent them by asking what others won’t, before it’s too late”
P.S. Know a PM leading a cyber project? Forward this, they’ll thank you for the checklist that surfaces what dashboards can’t.
Next week: "The Cyber Risk Ownership Matrix" (ensure nothing falls through the cracks post-delivery) Or any topic mind? Do post it :)
Was today's newsletter helpful? |
Reply